I really liked how Hannah took a totally different approach to her blog post. I didn't watch all of each episode, but I did look up parts of the episodes and found them both to be fairly entertaining. It was very interesting to see how she broke down the laugh tracks and saw how prevalent they were in each show. I liked how people were more likely to not laugh at something if it included a laugh track which also makes me wonder why shows still have them. Personally, I think they're really stupid unless they're used ironically, so this blog post confirmed that for me, which I really enjoyed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dlz8DVn1Mjc My favorite TV show is The Eric Andre Show. It's a tv interview parody show with extremely niche, random, absurd, and insane humor. The show can appear very stupid and silly at first, but watching many of the sketches or interviews will quickly convince you of Eric's humor. One of the best parts about the show is that the skits always evolve as they're happening. In this skit, at first, Eric simply appears to be a crazed man who works on Wall Street. However, it quickly spirals out of control and just turns into Eric vomiting on command and screaming about abortion. This is the main appeal of the show. It's random and crazy and unpredictable, and, scientifically, we laugh hardest when we are surprised or don't expect something. This continually changing skit embodies that idea, and Eric's show reflects that as a whole. As for the reading, I would say that Eric's humor falls under relief humor. The show is essen...
Interestingly, (in the original experiment I modeled this assignment after) some shows were ranked more humorous with a laugh track and another was ranked more humorous without. This case study therefore showed that the content of a show has an influence on whether or not a laugh track helps laughable situations. Maybe, the reason Friends continued to employ a laugh track was because the track works well with the content of the episode.
ReplyDeleteIt does seem that people used them for a long time because they did work. I think it was more of just a cultural expectation that had to shift first.
ReplyDelete